LinkedIn given another chance to stop data scraping
Old law prompts new decision
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
The US Supreme Court has givenLinkedInanother chance to try to prevent a company from harvesting personal data from its public profiles.
A couple of years ago, a US federal court told theMicrosoft-owned professional networking platform that it could not block companies like hiQ Labs from scraping personal data from public profiles.
Talent managementcompany hiQ Labs uses public data to analyze employee attrition, which is a use-case that LinkedIn contended threatened the privacy of its users. While the Supreme Court said it would not take on the case, it did order the 9th Circuit of Appeals court to hear the case again.
The CFAA
Reporting on the development,Engadgetnotes that the bone of contention in the case is the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, or CFAA, which prohibits accessing a computer without authorization.
In the original case, LinkedIn argued that the mass scraping of its users’ profiles was in violation of the CFAA. The court however sided with hiQ Labs which was of the opinion that a ruling against data scraping could “profoundly impact open access to the Internet.”
However, a recent development has brought the issue back to the surface.TechCrunchexplains that in a recent case, the Supreme Court ruled that a person cannot violate the CFAA if they improperly access data on a computer they have permission to use.
The case involved a police officer combing through the license plate database for an acquaintance in exchange for cash. The Supreme Court found this wasn’t in violation of the CFAA, in a way imposing a limit on what kind of conduct can be prosecuted, enabling LinkedIn to make its case again.
Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
Privacy advocacy groups such as the Electronics Frontier Foundation (EFF) have beencritical of the CFAAarguing that the three-decade old law wasn’t framed keeping in mind the sensibilities of the Internet-age.
With almost two decades of writing and reporting on Linux, Mayank Sharma would like everyone to think he’sTechRadar Pro’sexpert on the topic. Of course, he’s just as interested in other computing topics, particularly cybersecurity, cloud, containers, and coding.
This new phishing strategy utilizes GitHub comments to distribute malware
Should your VPN always be on?
Huge Black Friday Samsung sale: save up to $1,900 on QLED, OLED TVs, and more
