CentOS Linux ending because “Red Hat simply refused to invest in it”
CentOS Stream better aligns with Red Hat’s needs
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
The Red Hat/CentOS dispute has taken a new turn after a senior executive claimed that the former pulled the funding for theCentOSproject, leaving them no option but to shutter it.
Red Hat’s decision toend CentOShas been universally panned across the project’s ecosystem by users and contributors alike, and has resulted in at least twohigh-profile forks.
The development of CentOS is sponsored by Red Hat, both in terms of financial support and developer contributions.
Backing CentOS Stream
In an interview withThe Register, Brian Exelbierd, Red Hat Liaison and CentOS board member, admitted that Red Hat’s support comes with a caveat that “the CentOS board doesn’t get to decide what Red Hat engineering teams do.”
While the move to axe CentOS was made by theCentOS Board, it apparently came about as a result of Red Hat’s decision to only sponsor the development of CentOS Stream.
“Red Hat said, we’re going to make some fundamental changes in how we direct our investment. Then we went to the CentOS project and said, here is a thing Red Hat is going to do. We believe there are consequences of this action… the end result was the decision that got made by the project,” said Exelbierd.
Explaining Red Hat’s love for CentOS Stream, he said, the distro aligns with the company’s requirements.
Are you a pro? Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up to the TechRadar Pro newsletter to get all the top news, opinion, features and guidance your business needs to succeed!
“We laid out our case and we said we’re moving our engineering contribution, people time in some cases… we want to call your attention to them because depending on what you decide to do, there are potential liability issues that could result, so we want to make sure you have a plan.”
In the days following the announcement, Red Hat has opened up its developer license to allow the use of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) forfree for small scale production use. The company has said this is one of the first of its moves to strengthen its beleaguered user base.
Exelbierd goes on to make a strong case for CentOS Stream being an apt replacement for CentOS. However, the real issue is the immediateness of the decision including terminating the support cycle of CentOS 8 midstream.
While the decision to back CentOS Stream might sound logical from an engineering perspective, Red Hat has probably failed to take the loss of trust into account.
Via:The Register
With almost two decades of writing and reporting on Linux, Mayank Sharma would like everyone to think he’sTechRadar Pro’sexpert on the topic. Of course, he’s just as interested in other computing topics, particularly cybersecurity, cloud, containers, and coding.
New fanless cooling technology enhances energy efficiency for AI workloads by achieving a 90% reduction in cooling power consumption
Samsung plans record-breaking 400-layer NAND chip that could be key to breaking 200TB barrier for ultra large capacity AI hyperscaler SSDs
NYT Strands today — hints, answers and spangram for Sunday, November 10 (game #252)
