AMD Big Navi gets the better of Nvidia Ampere in GPU memory latency test
Latency advantage at lower resolutions?
When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.Here’s how it works.
AMDseems to have the upper hand compared toNvidiawhen it comes to memory latency performance with current-gen graphics cards.
This conclusion was drawn by tech siteChips and Cheesewhich ran comparisons between Big Navi andAmpere, using pointer chasing benchmarks (written in OpenCL) to assess memory latency in nanoseconds (ns) withAMD’s RX 6800 XTpitted againstNvidia’s RTX 3090.
And the results were interesting to say the least, when you consider that the Big Navi card has more cache layers to travel through on the journey to memory – yet it manages to match the Ampere GPU.
Nvidia runs with a straightforward scheme of two levels of cache – L1 and L2 – cache being the tiny amounts of very fast on-board storage (much faster than the actual video RAM) right there on the chip (just as is the case withCPUs).
With Big Navi, however, AMD does things very differently, using multiple layers of cache: L0, L1, L2 and Infinity Cache (which is effectively L3). Meaning there are more levels to pass through, as we mentioned, so you’d think that this could slow things down more in terms of latency – but that’s not the case.
In fact, AMD’s cache is impressively quick indeed, with latency being low through all those multiple layers, whereas Nvidia has a high L2 latency – 100ns, compared to around 66ns for AMD from L0 to L2. The upshot of all this is that the overall result is pretty much a dead heat.
Amazing feat
As Chips and Cheese observes: “Amazingly, RDNA 2’s [Big Navi] VRAM latency is about the same as Ampere’s, even though RDNA 2 is checking two more levels of cache on the way to memory.”
Get the best Black Friday deals direct to your inbox, plus news, reviews, and more.
Sign up to be the first to know about unmissable Black Friday deals on top tech, plus get all your favorite TechRadar content.
The site points out that AMD’s speedy L2 and L3 caches with their very low latency could giveBig NaviGPUs the edge in less demanding workloads, and that this might explain why RX 6000 graphics cards do very well at lower resolutions (where the GPU isn’t being pushed nearly as hard).
Certainly, that’s a tentative conclusion, and we need to be careful around reading too much into any one single test. Furthermore, it’s unclear how any such memory latency advantage might translate into real-world performance in games anyway.
Chips and Cheese also notes that memory latency with CPUs is far quicker, of course, but that comparatively “GDDR6 latency itself isn’t so bad” on an overall level.
ViaTom’s Hardware
Darren is a freelancer writing news and features for TechRadar (and occasionally T3) across a broad range of computing topics including CPUs, GPUs, various other hardware, VPNs, antivirus and more. He has written about tech for the best part of three decades, and writes books in his spare time (his debut novel - ‘I Know What You Did Last Supper’ - was published by Hachette UK in 2013).
Intel Battlemage rumored for December – could new budget GPUs win over gamers neglected by Nvidia and save the Arc brand?
Nvidia RTX 5090 Ti suddenly pops up – and RTX 6000 GPUs are mentioned in trademark filings too – but don’t get excited
From Dishonored to Mafia: Definitive Edition, some of my favorite games are free right now for Amazon Prime members
